Posts Tagged

Governance

In October 2026, California’s Department of Insurance issued Bulletin 2026-8 on separate-account products with general-account guarantees, including pension risk transfers. Dated 29 October, the bulletin adds filing, financial and disclosure requirements under existing statutory authority. It does not give blanket approval to every insurer or transfer arrangement. For pension sponsors, the practical question is how the promised benefits are supported by the actual contract and participating organisations. A description

In October 2026, PLANSPONSOR reported that six employers had sued UnitedHealth over administration of their self-funded health plans. Its 29 October coverage concerned a complaint filed on 20 October in the Eastern District of Texas by Aramark, Kraft Heinz, Ralph Lauren, Sterling Jewelers, Grainger and Whirlpool. The employers allege problems with claims processing, fees, cross-plan offsets and access to data. UnitedHealthcare strongly disputes the allegations and says it will

In October 2026, ECIROA announced Harald J.A. Schuster’s appointment as executive manager, effective from 1 October, according to Captive International’s report of 23 October. He will work alongside Günther Dröse through the European Captive Forum 2027, with the subsequent full handover subject to final board confirmation. The transition concerns the association’s advocacy, education and networking work. It does not establish a new employee-benefits captive strategy or a change in

In October 2026, Utmost published details of an £11.1 million buy-in for the Welsh National Opera Limited Pension Scheme, reproducing an announcement from adviser Isio on 23 October. The transaction had completed on 15 September. Its disclosure provides a useful smaller-scheme example for trustees and corporate benefits teams considering how to prepare for insurance. The policy covers 158 members, comprising 95 deferred members and 63 pensioners. The account describes

In September 2026, EIOPA published a follow-up note on its efforts to simplify insurance and occupational-pension regulation and supervision. It described reporting-template reductions associated with revised Solvency II: 26% for quarterly and 30% for annual templates for solo undertakings, with larger reductions cited for small and non-complex undertakings. EIOPA also said it had reviewed 25 sets of guidelines and shortened them by around a third. These are EIOPA’s account

In September 2026, KPMG published research showing that insurance leaders’ confidence in AI transformation exceeds their reported readiness in important areas. The release appeared on 29 September, drawing on research conducted from 20 to 29 May and supplementary insurance research. For insurers and benefits providers, the useful response is to test what an AI workflow delivers and what supports it. A management assessment of relative leadership cannot by itself

Aon in September 2026 announced a new leadership and governance structure for Reinsurance Solutions in Germany, effective 1 October 2026. Phillip Esser will become chief executive, while Volker Wahl will serve as executive chairman. Jan-Oliver Thofern, whose retirement is planned for 1 January 2027, will advise Esser through the remainder of 2026. The firm is also establishing a seven-member Board of Reinsurance. Aon says the structure will bring together

A human fallback changed the nature of the service Reuters in September 2026 reported that Meta tested human contractors to handle some telephone calls initiated through Muse, its personal AI agent. Employees raised privacy concerns, and Meta rolled the feature back after acknowledging that the test had started without adequate disclosure. Internal tests cited by Reuters indicated that human handling could raise call success to between 95% and 98%,

In September 2026, Reuters reported that UK insurers had asked the Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) to reconsider the design of its first Dynamic General Insurance Stress Test, or DyGIST, following the live exercise conducted in May 2026. The debate matters beyond the UK market because DyGIST represents a different view of stress testing: one that examines how an organisation responds while a crisis is unfolding, rather

A June 2026 NBER working paper examines whether employee reviews can reveal information about product and service quality before problems become visible externally. Wei Cai, Dennis Campbell, Yaxuan Chen, Yufei Chen and Andrea Prat use more than 4.3 million Glassdoor reviews to construct firm-level quality measures for S&P 1500 companies covering 2008 to 2023. The authors train machine-learning models using customer satisfaction information for a subset of firms and

Alex Chan’s working paper, Optimal Medical Liability for AI, is dated 9 June 2026 in the Harvard Business School version and was circulated by NBER in June 2026. The paper develops a theoretical framework for situations where AI acts as a doctor rather than only assisting a clinician. It examines how the available medical record affects the incentives and responsibilities that a liability arrangement can create. The argument is

Preference for Explainable AI, NBER Working Paper 35240 by Alex Chan, studies participants acting as loan officers on real $10,000 loans from a US lender. The May 2026 paper finds that explanations revealing demographic penalties made participants more likely to override the AI recommendation. When bonuses depended on repayment, participants sought predictions but avoided explanations under some experimental conditions. A secondary experiment examines difficulty recognising when explanations improve decisions.

The May 2026 NBER Digest discusses Competition and Fraud in Health Care, Working Paper 34802, issued in February. The study examines Medicare procurement of durable medical equipment after a move from administered prices to competitive bidding. The authors find that fraudulent firms gained market share as legitimate providers exited, reflecting a cost advantage for fraudulent operators. The findings concern a specific setting. They do not establish the same outcome

Everywhen’s publication dated 14 April 2026 reports that 43% of UK companies do not have a formal health and wellbeing strategy. The finding concerns employers’ reported approach to strategy. It does not measure diagnosed illness, employee access to treatment or the effectiveness of a particular benefit. The publisher’s indexed announcement was available for this review, but the complete publication and its methodology were not retrieved. The figure should therefore

Airmic’s 2026 captive survey, publicised on 2 April 2026, describes expanding use of captives beyond traditional property and casualty business. Its report says more than half of respondents are writing Employee Benefits through their captives. The survey also examines governance, reinsurance and interest in a prospective UK captive framework. These findings describe the participating Airmic membership. They are not a measure of the proportion of all captives worldwide that

Vermont’s Act 77, signed on 24 March 2026, amends the state’s captive-insurance legislation with an effective date of 1 July 2026. The changes address financial reporting, risk retention groups and the signing of reports for protected cells. Employers with Vermont structures should examine the provisions applicable to their particular legal entity. Match the requirement to the structure The legislation specifies reporting requirements for risk retention groups, including annual and

In an interview published on 26 February 2026, Vitalant describes the evolution of its Cayman captive and the possibility of changing retentions, limits and financing arrangements. The portfolio has expanded to include medical stop-loss and employment-related exposures, providing a concrete connection between captive strategy and employee benefits. The interview makes an important distinction about reinsurance: it is being considered, but is not yet in place in the account reviewed.

In Packaging Corporation of America Thrift Plan for Hourly Employees v. Langdon, decided on 2 February 2026, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit considered an attempted beneficiary change after divorce. The participant’s fax expressed his wish to remove his former spouse, but he had not followed the plan’s specified telephone or online process. The court found that the participant had not satisfied the substantial compliance test

In an analysis published on 15 January 2026, Greg Lang examines gap collateral and the accumulation of security across successive policy years. Older unresolved claims can keep collateral committed while a new policy year adds further requirements. His discussion considers reinsurance, alternative security and claims administration as possible responses. This is a practitioner analysis, mainly concerning general insurance risks. It is not a new regulatory requirement or an independently

Phillip Giles’s analysis published on 25 November 2025 examines the evolution of medical stop-loss group captives towards more coordinated cost-control arrangements. It argues for selective participation, aligned partners and programme-manager accountability, and discusses the implications when members implement different levels of cost control. This is an update to the earlier GBV discussion of risk retention and exit terms. The emphasis here is the operational programme and its participation criteria.

In January 2025, the UK government announced plans to ease restrictions on returning defined-benefit pension surpluses. For employers, the proposal raised a funding and governance question: how might a future release support their pension arrangements or wider reward decisions while protecting promised benefits? Read the dated development The announcement envisaged agreements between employers and trustees. It preserved the trustees’ overarching duty to protect members’ benefits. The policy announcement did

In January 2024, The Pensions Regulator laid its General Code in Parliament, consolidating ten existing codes covering pension governance and administration. The original announcement anticipated commencement on 27 March; the regulator’s later annual report records actual commencement on 28 March 2024. The historical distinction matters. The code brought expectations into a more coherent format, while many underlying standards were already established. For multinational pension sponsors, the practical question is

In December 2023, Captive International published results from a survey conducted with ECIROA on independent non-executive directors in captive governance. The report described perceived benefits of independent judgement and highlighted questions about committee participation. It offers useful prompts for a board review, although the accessible report does not establish a representative sample of the entire captive market. Appointing an independent director is only the beginning of defining how that

In May 2022, McKinsey published an analysis of employers’ health benefit priorities based on a September 2021 survey of 1,640 employers. The findings described intentions to expand benefits while managing medical costs. They do not establish that adding a specialist provider produces better care or lower expenditure. For benefits buyers, the useful next step is to define the problem a proposed vendor would be responsible for solving. Start with

Aon and the American Benefits Council have released the Global Benefits Governance and Operations Study 2018/2019. The study queried over 200 multinational companies  ranging in size from over 100,000 to fewer than 10,000 employees, and asked global compensation and benefits leaders for their views on best practices in global benefits management. The survey also explored key issues such as what these organizations can do to improve the alignment of